Speaker summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video613.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Berry results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Halo Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 136 hits. Analysis detected 1,122.347 faulty-reasoning hits from 613.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (25,835 of 28,364 speakers). This Jonathan Berry is better (less manipulative) than 91.10% of the peer group.
Jonathan Berry
Speaker details
Total words: 613.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

9% percentile
02550751008.9% percentile
8.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos613.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.3%5.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 21.3%21.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 18.7%18.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 18.1%18.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 0.3%Loss Aversion: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 4.6%Primacy Effect: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos