Author summary
39%1 analyzed article/video1,113 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leen Yassine results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 402 hits. Analysis detected 2,303 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,339 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (3,043 of 6,628 authors). This Leen Yassine is worse (more manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Leen Yassine
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
55%Leen Yassine (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,339
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

54% percentile
025507510054.1% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 12.0%12.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.6%3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 3.8%3.8%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Author 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Author 12.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.3%Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Composition/Division: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos