Speaker summary
69% 3 analyzed articles/videos 330 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jon Scholes results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Overconfidence Bias , and False Dilemma , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 31.2% saturation with 114.21 hits . Analysis detected 945.093 faulty-reasoning hits from 330 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.1% and a BS Rank of 16% (23,848 of 28,364 speakers). This Jon Scholes is better (less manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group. Jon Scholes
Speaker details
Total words: 330
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.9% percentile 12.1% BS Score3 analyzed videos330 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 31.3% 31.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 24.5% 24.5% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 20.5% 20.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 18.6% 18.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 19.3% 19.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 12.2% 12.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 8.9% 8.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 21.4% 21.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 13.6% 13.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 31.3%, sitewide 7.5% Framing Effect: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 26.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 24.5%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 4.6% Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 6.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 6.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst