Speaker summary
94% 1 analyzed article/video 111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jon Ossoff (D-GA) results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Ad Hominem , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 85.6% saturation with 95 hits . Analysis detected 453 faulty-reasoning hits from 111 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.2% and a BS Rank of 47% (15,170 of 28,364 speakers). This Jon Ossoff (D-GA) is better (less manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group. Jon Ossoff (D-GA)
Speaker details
Total words: 111
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.5% percentile 29.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos111 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 85.6% 85.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 64.0% 64.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 45.0% 45.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 38.7% 38.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 23.4% 23.4% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 19.8% 19.8% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 19.8% 19.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 17.1% 17.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 16.2% 16.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Negativity Bias: Speaker 85.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 64.0%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 45.0%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 38.7%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 0.4% Slippery Slope: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 1.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 8.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst