Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video79 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Telesmanic results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 60.6% saturation with 47.902 hits. Analysis detected 199.902 faulty-reasoning hits from 79 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (16,106 of 28,364 speakers). This John Telesmanic is better (less manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
John Telesmanic
Speaker details
Total words: 79
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510043.2% percentile
26.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos79 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 60.6%60.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 29.2%29.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 29.2%29.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 29.2%29.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 18.3%18.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 18.3%18.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 60.6%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 29.2%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 29.2%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 29.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 4.0%Burden of Proof: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos