Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video143.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Samuelsen results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Ad Hominem, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 66.3% saturation with 159 hits. Analysis detected 508.831 faulty-reasoning hits from 143.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 28.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (14,509 of 26,730 speakers). This John Samuelsen is better (less manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
John Samuelsen
Speaker details
Total words: 143.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510045.7% percentile
28.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos143.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 66.3%66.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 52.6%52.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 46.2%46.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 24.4%24.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 12.1%12.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 8.8%8.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 66.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 52.6%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 46.2%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos