Speaker summary
53% 1 analyzed article/video 231 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Openshaw results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 26.3% saturation with 90 hits . Analysis detected 422.704 faulty-reasoning hits from 231 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.8% and a BS Rank of 11% (25,270 of 28,364 speakers). This John Openshaw is better (less manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group. John Openshaw
Speaker details
Total words: 231
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.9% percentile 9.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos231 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 21.6% 21.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 26.3% 26.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 10.8% 10.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 10.7% 10.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 12.6% 12.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 4.4% 4.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 9.7% 9.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 26.3%, sitewide 11.1% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.4% Recency Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst