Author summary
26% 1 analyzed article/video 1,085 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catherine Ho results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Optimism Bias , and Status Quo Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 228 hits . Analysis detected 2,015 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,255 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (3,598 of 6,347 authors). This Catherine Ho is better (less manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group. Catherine Ho
Author details
Total words: 3,255
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.3% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.8% 6.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.0% 7.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst