Speaker summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video72 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Karastamatis results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 270 faulty-reasoning hits from 72 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (16,882 of 28,364 speakers). This John Karastamatis is better (less manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
John Karastamatis
Speaker details
Total words: 72
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510040.5% percentile
25.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos72 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 25.0%25.0%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 25.0%25.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 25.0%25.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 25.0%25.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 6.9%No True Scotsman: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos