Speaker summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video83 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Hennegan results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 34.2% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 238.896 faulty-reasoning hits from 83 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 28.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (15,329 of 28,364 speakers). This John Hennegan is better (less manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group.
John Hennegan
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510046.0% percentile
28.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos83 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 44.2%44.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 34.2%34.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 31.5%31.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 31.5%31.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 22.5%22.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 31.5%31.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 11.7%11.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 44.2%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 34.2%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos