Speaker summary
⁠83%3 analyzed articles/videos108.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Healey results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 29% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 569.713 faulty-reasoning hits from 108.333 analyzed words across 3 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 21.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (18,657 of 28,364 speakers). This John Healey is better (less manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510034.2% percentile
21.2% BS Score3 analyzed videos108.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 37.3%37.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 47.8%47.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 31.0%31.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 29.0%29.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 32.3%32.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 23.7%23.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 23.4%23.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 47.8%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 37.3%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 32.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 31.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.0%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos