Speaker summary
⁠56%2 analyzed articles/videos57.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Haltiwanger results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 190 faulty-reasoning hits from 57.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 51.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,072 of 28,364 speakers). This John Haltiwanger is worse (more manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group.
John Haltiwanger
Speaker details
Total words: 57.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510071.5% percentile
51.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos57.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 39.6%39.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 39.6%39.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 39.6%39.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 39.6%39.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 39.6%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 39.6%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 39.6%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 39.6%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos