Author summary
⁠6%1 analyzed article/video1,328 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drew Gorman results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 304 hits. Analysis detected 2,043 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (6,433 of 6,628 authors). This Drew Gorman is better (less manipulative) than 97.10% of the peer group.
Drew Gorman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠3%Drew Gorman (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,312
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

3% percentile
02550751002.9% percentile
1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.3%5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.8%1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.7%5.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos