Speaker summary
55% 31 analyzed articles/videos 5,216.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Fetterman results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Ad Hominem , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 929.133 hits . Analysis detected 7,969.701 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,216.667 analyzed words across 31 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,247 of 28,364 speakers). This John Fetterman is better (less manipulative) than 99.60% of the peer group. John Fetterman
Speaker details
Total words: 5,216.667
Content count: 31
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.4% percentile 2.6% BS Score31 analyzed videos5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 15.1% 15.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 9.7% 9.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst