Speaker summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video2,626 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Cameron Mitchell results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 360.687 hits. Analysis detected 2,772.902 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,626 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (28,160 of 28,364 speakers). This John Cameron Mitchell is better (less manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group.
John Cameron Mitchell
Speaker details
Total words: 2,626
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751000.7% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 4.0%4.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 2.6%2.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos