Speaker summary
50% 1 analyzed article/video 194.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Blick results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 33.4% saturation with 113 hits . Analysis detected 600.672 faulty-reasoning hits from 194.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.4% and a BS Rank of 19% (23,054 of 28,364 speakers). This John Blick is better (less manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group. John Blick
Speaker details
Total words: 194.667
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.7% percentile 13.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos194.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 33.4% 33.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 23.1% 23.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 20.7% 20.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 12.1% 12.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 9.5% 9.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 16.1% 16.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 13.7% 13.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 20.4% 20.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Anecdotal: Speaker 33.4%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 0.8% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 9.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst