Speaker summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video85.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joelle Casteix results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Pessimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 75.4% saturation with 72.375 hits. Analysis detected 307.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 85.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 39.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (11,362 of 26,547 speakers). This Joelle Casteix is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
Joelle Casteix
Speaker details
Total words: 85.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510057.2% percentile
39.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos85.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 75.4%75.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 67.2%67.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 33.6%33.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 33.6%33.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 33.6%33.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 16.4%16.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 16.4%16.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Optimism Bias: Speaker 75.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 67.2%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 33.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 33.6%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 33.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos