Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video54 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joel Webbon results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Genetic Fallacy, Negativity Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 135 faulty-reasoning hits from 54 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,718 of 28,355 speakers). This Joel Webbon is worse (more manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group.
Joel Webbon
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 54
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510076.3% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos54 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.4%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos