Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video58.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joel Hancock results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 58.5 hits. Analysis detected 297.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 58.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 60.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (6,553 of 26,155 speakers). This Joel Hancock is worse (more manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.
Joel Hancock
Speaker details
Total words: 58.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.9% percentile
60.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos58.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos