Speaker summary
⁠53%1 analyzed article/video270.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joel Galvez results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Optimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 58.04 hits. Analysis detected 181.779 faulty-reasoning hits from 270.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (27,178 of 28,364 speakers). This Joel Galvez is better (less manipulative) than 95.80% of the peer group.
Joel Galvez
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠5%Joel Galvez (selected)7%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 270.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

4% percentile
02550751004.2% percentile
6.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos270.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 1.5%1.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 21.5%21.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 1.3%1.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 1.5%1.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos