Speaker summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video1,001.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Bagley results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 197.533 hits. Analysis detected 1,223.554 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,001.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (27,890 of 28,364 speakers). This Joe Bagley is better (less manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group.
Joe Bagley
Speaker details
Total words: 1,001.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751001.7% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 0.5%0.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 4.8%4.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 5.5%5.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 2.5%2.5%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.6%Recency Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.4%No True Scotsman: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos