Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,025 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meghan Bartels results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and False Dilemma , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 475 hits . Analysis detected 2,357 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 36% (4,293 of 6,628 authors). This Meghan Bartels is better (less manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group. Meghan Bartels
Author details
Total words: 4,100
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.2% 5.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.6% 11.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.6%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst