Speaker summary
77%6 analyzed articles/videos291 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jodie Ginsberg results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 53.7% saturation with 181.381 hits. Analysis detected 883.084 faulty-reasoning hits from 291 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 26.7% and a BS Rank of 44% (16,147 of 28,364 speakers). This Jodie Ginsberg is better (less manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group.
Jodie Ginsberg
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510043.1% percentile
26.7% BS Score6 analyzed videos291 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 77.8%77.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 53.7%53.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 42.0%42.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 38.3%38.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.0%9.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 15.1%15.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 77.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 53.7%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 42.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 38.3%, sitewide 26.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate