Publication summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Grenada Chronicle – Daily Grenada results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 578 hits. Analysis detected 1,974 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 410 publications). This Grenada Chronicle – Daily Grenada is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Grenada Chronicle – Daily Grenada
Publication ranking list
Publication details
Total words: 4,872
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 6.1%6.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Publication 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 11.9%11.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Publication 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 11.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos