Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Grenada Chronicle – Daily Grenada results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 578 hits . Analysis detected 1,974 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 410 publications). This Grenada Chronicle – Daily Grenada is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Grenada Chronicle – Daily Grenada Publication details
Total words: 4,872
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 11.9% 11.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 11.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 0.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst