Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video227 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joan Capdevila results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50.4% saturation with 114.301 hits. Analysis detected 249.301 faulty-reasoning hits from 227 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (24,257 of 28,364 speakers). This Joan Capdevila is better (less manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group.
Joan Capdevila
Speaker details
Total words: 227
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

15% percentile
025507510014.5% percentile
11.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos227 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.4%50.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 8.7%8.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 9.3%9.3%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.4%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos