Speaker summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video88.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These JL Botor results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 41.9% saturation with 37.125 hits. Analysis detected 181.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 88.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (15,506 of 27,648 speakers). This JL Botor is better (less manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group.
JL Botor
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 88.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510043.9% percentile
27.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos88.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 42.0%42.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 22.0%22.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 28.0%28.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 28.0%28.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 22.0%22.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 22.0%22.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 42.0%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos