Speaker summary
⁠48%2 analyzed articles/videos190.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Justice results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Fundamental Attribution Error, and Actor-Observer Bias, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 345.926 faulty-reasoning hits from 190.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (24,651 of 28,364 speakers). This Jim Justice is better (less manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group.
Jim Justice
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 190.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

13% percentile
025507510013.1% percentile
10.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos190.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 22.6%22.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 21.8%21.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.4%4.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 16.0%16.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 10.5%10.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 2.5%2.5%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 26.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 0.6%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos