Speaker summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video81 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Derwinski results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 29.6% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 223.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 81 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (17,098 of 28,364 speakers). This Jim Derwinski is better (less manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group.
Jim Derwinski
Speaker details
Total words: 81
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

40% percentile
025507510039.7% percentile
24.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos81 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 29.6%29.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 30.6%30.6%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 29.6%29.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 30.6%30.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 20.4%20.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 0.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos