Author summary
9% 3 analyzed articles/videos 603 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elijah James results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anecdotal , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 392 hits . Analysis detected 3,774 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,645 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 32% (4,374 of 6,360 authors). This Elijah James is better (less manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group. Elijah James
Author details
Total words: 5,645
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.7% 1.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst