Speaker summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video156.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jill Snyder results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 34.3% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 253.966 faulty-reasoning hits from 156.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (21,393 of 28,364 speakers). This Jill Snyder is better (less manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group.
Jill Snyder
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 156.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

25% percentile
025507510024.6% percentile
16.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos156.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 34.3%34.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 18.5%18.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 7.3%7.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 21.3%21.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 19.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos