Speaker summary
⁠66%2 analyzed articles/videos152 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jill Lepore results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Ad Hominem, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 28.8% saturation with 49.082 hits. Analysis detected 483.059 faulty-reasoning hits from 152 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (24,899 of 28,364 speakers). This Jill Lepore is better (less manipulative) than 87.80% of the peer group.
Jill Lepore
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 152
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

12% percentile
025507510012.2% percentile
10.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos152 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 28.8%28.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 16.8%16.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 17.8%17.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.2%2.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 17.8%17.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos