Speaker summary
⁠67%2 analyzed articles/videos116 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jia Tolentino results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 48.4% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 527.221 faulty-reasoning hits from 116 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 35% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,170 of 28,364 speakers). This Jia Tolentino is worse (more manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group.
Jia Tolentino
Speaker details
Total words: 116
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510053.6% percentile
35.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos116 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 56.5%56.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 54.7%54.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 38.6%38.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 48.4%48.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 33.0%33.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 34.1%34.1%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 17.0%17.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 22.5%22.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 56.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 54.7%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 48.4%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 38.6%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 34.1%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 33.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 15.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 2.7%Tu Quoque: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos