Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Louis Staples results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34% saturation with 1,494 hits . Analysis detected 5,779 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,396 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,498 authors). This Louis Staples is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Louis Staples
Author details
Total words: 4,396
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 34.0% 34.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 19.9% 19.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 34.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 19.9%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 18.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst