Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video33.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jesse Newman results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 88% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 96.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 33.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,422 of 28,364 speakers). This Jesse Newman is worse (more manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group.
Jesse Newman
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 33.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510059.7% percentile
42.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos33.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 88.0%88.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 66.0%66.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 44.0%44.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Halo Effect: Speaker 88.0%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 66.0%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 44.0%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 2.7%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos