Speaker summary
83% 1 analyzed article/video 278 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jesse Miranda results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 29.8% saturation with 82.951 hits . Analysis detected 520.901 faulty-reasoning hits from 278 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.1% and a BS Rank of 14% (24,450 of 28,364 speakers). This Jesse Miranda is better (less manipulative) than 86.20% of the peer group. Jesse Miranda
Speaker details
Total words: 278
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.8% percentile 11.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos278 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 22.4% 22.4% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 22.9% 22.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 29.8% 29.8% Personal Incredulity Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 13.8% 13.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 13.7% 13.7% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 15.0% 15.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 9.0% 9.0% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 29.8%, sitewide 15.9% Loss Aversion: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 1.5% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 8.1% Personal Incredulity: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 3.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.3% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst