Speaker summary
⁠54%2 analyzed articles/videos165 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jerome Powell results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Status Quo Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 34% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 301.031 faulty-reasoning hits from 165 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 19.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (19,742 of 28,364 speakers). This Jerome Powell is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
Jerome Powell
Speaker details
Total words: 165
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510030.4% percentile
19.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos165 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 34.0%34.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 32.8%32.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 25.9%25.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.9%12.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 7.7%7.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 34.0%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 32.8%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 25.9%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos