Speaker summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video208 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jerome Guthrie results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 227.86 faulty-reasoning hits from 208 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (24,659 of 28,364 speakers). This Jerome Guthrie is better (less manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group.
Jerome Guthrie
Speaker details
Total words: 208
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

13% percentile
025507510013.1% percentile
10.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos208 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos