Speaker summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video27 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeremy Irons results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 51.9% saturation with 14 hits. Analysis detected 27 faulty-reasoning hits from 27 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (9,099 of 28,364 speakers). This Jeremy Irons is worse (more manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group.
Jeremy Irons
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 27
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

68% percentile
025507510067.9% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos27 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 48.1%48.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 51.9%51.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 51.9%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 48.1%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos