Author summary
75%7 analyzed articles/videos6,298 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen Radochia results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Halo Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 4,017 hits. Analysis detected 37,144 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,760 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,345 of 6,316 authors). This Stephen Radochia is better (less manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group.
Stephen Radochia
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
47%Stephen Radochia (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 29,760
Article count: 7
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

47% percentile
025507510047.0% percentile
2.5% BS Score7 analyzed articles29.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 12.6%12.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 10.9%10.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 13.5%13.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 13.5%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Author 10.9%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate