Speaker summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video176 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeremy Fisher results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Loss Aversion, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 65.2% saturation with 172 hits. Analysis detected 484.222 faulty-reasoning hits from 176 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (17,216 of 28,364 speakers). This Jeremy Fisher is better (less manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group.
Jeremy Fisher
Speaker details
Total words: 176
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

39% percentile
025507510039.3% percentile
24.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos176 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 65.2%65.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 19.7%19.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 30.3%30.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 35.4%35.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 65.2%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 19.2%Loss Aversion: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos