Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video81.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeremy Corbell results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 38.1% saturation with 34.875 hits. Analysis detected 187.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 81.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,395 of 28,364 speakers). This Jeremy Corbell is better (less manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.
Jeremy Corbell
Speaker details
Total words: 81.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510049.3% percentile
31.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos81.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 49.2%49.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 24.6%24.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 38.1%38.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 25.4%25.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 49.2%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 38.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos