Speaker summary
⁠66%2 analyzed articles/videos210.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jenny Voisard results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 43.4% saturation with 126 hits. Analysis detected 242.135 faulty-reasoning hits from 210.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (24,705 of 28,364 speakers). This Jenny Voisard is better (less manipulative) than 87.10% of the peer group.
Jenny Voisard
Speaker details
Total words: 210.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

13% percentile
025507510012.9% percentile
10.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos210.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 43.5%43.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 7.2%7.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 4.8%4.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 2.8%2.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 8.1%8.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 43.5%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Begging the Question: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos