With Big Bear eagle ailing, OpenAI co-founder drops $5.5M to buy land near nest 28%

By Lila Seidman33%

7/24/2026, 10:37:02 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Status Quo Bias, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 103 hits. Analysis detected 714 faulty-reasoning hits from 634 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39% and a BS Rank of 28% (15,756 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 72.00% of the article peer group.

With Big Bear eagle Jackie in intensive care for nearly a week battling an unexplained malady, fans of the Internet-famous bird and her mate Shadow were sorely in need of a silver lining  and just got one. 
On Friday, Friends of Big Bear Valley, a nonprofit that monitors the eagles, announced that OpenAI co-founder Greg Brockman and his wife Anna donated $5.5 million to a fundraiser to buy land slated for development near the pair’s nest. 
The infusion of cash means the fundraising goal of $10 million is met. 
“I’m so happy for this,” said Jenny Voisard, website and media manager for Friends of Big Bear Valley. 
“I think we needed a little bit of good news given Jackie’s situation.” 
The Brockmans are among the thousands across the globe who have watched Jackie and Shadow bond and raise chicks via webcams installed by the nonprofit, Anna Brockman said in a statement. 
“They inspire perseverance and a sense of connectedness to something greater, to nature,” she said. 
“We are proud to be supportive.” 
The nonprofit has long maintained that the land  reportedly the last undeveloped sliver of Big Bear Lake’s shoreline  represents critical foraging habitat for the eagles. 
Last September, the San Bernardino Board of Supervisors approved a 50-home and 55-slip marina project on it called Moon Camp, with county officials saying it wouldn’t harm the raptors. 
While the nonprofit is best known for turning Jackie and Shadow into celebrities by livestreaming their nest, it grew out of an effort to stop the same project 25 years ago. 
In February, it launched an ambitious fundraiser to prevent the development once and for all. 
Even with 25,000 donations, it didn’t crack the halfway mark. 
Most of them were small. 
Then just before the Fourth of July, Anna Brockman reached out to the nonprofit through a representative, Voisard said. 
After several calls, the generous gift was set. 
But before it was publicly announced, tragedy struck the nest. 
According to ABC 7, a couple spotted Jackie sparring with two younger eagles on the lake shore last Friday. 
When she hadn’t returned to the nest that night, they reached out for help  leading to her rescue and transfer to the Ojai Raptor Center. 
Since then, she’s undergone a battery of tests and even received a live-saving blood transfusion. 
Yet experts are still trying to determine the cause of her condition, which includes severe anemia. 
So far, the raptor center says it has ruled out lead poisoning and the presence of swallowed objects, among other things. 
As of Thursday, she was in critical condition and receiving intensive care, though she’d regained some of her feisty energy. 
The center expects to provide an update again Monday, “[i]f all goes according to plan.” 
As fans wait on tenterhooks for more health updates, many are celebrating the fundraising win. 
“Who’s cutting onions??” 
one commenter wrote on Facebook, along with a crying emoji. 
Someone replied, “I think we all are.” 
With all the donations, the San Bernardino Mountains Land Trust can purchase the parcel, as well as cover closing costs, taxes, legal fees and some maintenance of the land. 
Previously, the land trust was going to transfer the land to the U.S. 
Forest Service but has opted not to do that, Voisard said. 
She suggested they no longer trust federal officials to protect it. 
Sandy Steers, former executive director of Friends of Big Bear Valley, helped broker the deal between the land trust and developers. 
She passed away shortly before the fundraiser launched, leaving her conservation mission in the hands of her colleagues and supporters. 
“I know she’s proud and happy,” Voisard said. 
“Now we just want Jackie to come home and enjoy her Moon Camp.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.8%Lila Seidman: 2.7%Daily Pilot: 2.9%Confirmation Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Lila Seidman: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 3.5%Availability Heuristic3.0%This article: 0.8%Lila Seidman: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.8%This article: 2.1%Lila Seidman: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Hindsight Bias2.1%This article: 4.9%Lila Seidman: 1.6%Daily Pilot: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias4.9%This article: 8.0%Lila Seidman: 4.2%Daily Pilot: 7.5%Framing Effect8.0%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 8.4%Lila Seidman: 2.8%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Status Quo Bias8.4%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 16.2%Lila Seidman: 6.1%Daily Pilot: 3.6%Optimism Bias16.2%This article: 4.4%Lila Seidman: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 1.4%Pessimism Bias4.4%This article: 9.6%Lila Seidman: 5.7%Daily Pilot: 7.8%Negativity Bias9.6%This article: 0.9%Lila Seidman: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.9%This article: 4.6%Lila Seidman: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error4.6%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Lila Seidman: 1.9%Daily Pilot: 5.1%Halo Effect5.7%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.5%Lila Seidman: 1.8%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Recency Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.6%Lila Seidman: 2.5%Daily Pilot: 4.9%Appeal to Authority7.6%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.9%Lila Seidman: 2.2%Daily Pilot: 4.4%Hasty Generalization4.9%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.1%Lila Seidman: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Bandwagon1.1%This article: 2.2%Lila Seidman: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion2.2%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.4%Lila Seidman: 1.8%Daily Pilot: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.4%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 4.3%Lila Seidman: 1.4%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Appeal to Nature4.3%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 1.6%Lila Seidman: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 2.8%Anecdotal1.6%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 6.0%Lila Seidman: 7.6%Daily Pilot: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice6.0%This article: 1.7%Lila Seidman: 0.6%Daily Pilot: 1.5%Indoctrination1.7%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lila Seidman: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

634 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers23%attributed speech489writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJenny Voisard • 18 words • 0.0% coverageJenny Voisard • 13 words • 0.0% coverageAnna Brockman • 31 words • 0.0% coverageAnna Brockman • 15 words • 0.0% coverageAnna Brockman • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageVoisard • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageVoisard • 11 words • 0.0% coverageVoisard • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageVoisard • 8 words • 0.0% coverageVoisard • 13 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jenny Voisard

100%flagged-word coverage
31 attributed words21% of attributed speech85% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-7.8 ptsWriter: 7.8%Jenny Voisard: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.