Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video56 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Plante results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 181 faulty-reasoning hits from 56 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 60% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (7,046 of 28,364 speakers). This Jennifer Plante is worse (more manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
Jennifer Plante
Speaker details
Total words: 56
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510075.2% percentile
60.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos56 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 62.3%62.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 62.3%62.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 37.7%37.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 37.7%37.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 62.3%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 62.3%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 37.7%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 37.7%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos