Speaker summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video78.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Kavanagh results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 70.3% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 247.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 78.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 36.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (12,793 of 28,364 speakers). This Jennifer Kavanagh is worse (more manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
Jennifer Kavanagh
Speaker details
Total words: 78.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510054.9% percentile
36.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos78.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 70.3%70.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 39.8%39.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 29.7%29.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 29.7%29.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 29.7%29.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 70.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 39.8%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 29.7%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity Bias: Speaker 29.7%, sitewide 19.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 29.7%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos