Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video78 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeffries results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Bandwagon, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 251 faulty-reasoning hits from 78 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 64.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,501 of 28,364 speakers). This Jeffries is worse (more manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.
Jeffries
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 78
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510077.1% percentile
64.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos78 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 78.2%78.2%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 21.8%21.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 21.8%21.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 78.2%, sitewide 26.9%Bandwagon: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos