Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video102 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeff Rosen results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 245 faulty-reasoning hits from 102 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,137 of 28,364 speakers). This Jeff Rosen is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Jeff Rosen
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 102
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510053.7% percentile
35.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos102 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 60.3%60.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 30.1%30.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 30.1%30.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 60.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 30.1%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 30.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 6.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos