Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video88.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeff Eichorn results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Circular Reasoning, and Appeal to Authority, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 43.2% saturation with 51 hits. Analysis detected 182.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 88.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (18,799 of 28,364 speakers). This Jeff Eichorn is better (less manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group.
Jeff Eichorn
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 88.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510033.7% percentile
21.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos88.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 53.4%53.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 43.2%43.2%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 21.2%21.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 53.4%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 43.2%, sitewide 6.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 21.2%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 1.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 6.7%Primacy Effect: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos