Speaker summary
⁠43%1 analyzed article/video100 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeff Chan results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Anecdotal, and False Dilemma, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 57.1% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 240 faulty-reasoning hits from 100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (11,727 of 28,364 speakers). This Jeff Chan is worse (more manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group.
Jeff Chan
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 100
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510058.7% percentile
40.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos100 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 57.1%57.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 36.4%36.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 36.4%36.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 36.4%36.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 36.4%36.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Loss Aversion: Speaker 57.1%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 36.4%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 36.4%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 36.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 36.4%, sitewide 3.3%Loss AversionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos